Legal Opinion

Shirley DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otto E. PASSMAN, Congressman of the United States, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1978No. 75-1691PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*795CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge:

In today’s decision the court en banc reverses a panel opinion which implied a cause of action for money damages from the Due Process Clause of the fifth amendment of the Constitution.1

In her complaint, Ms. Shirley Davis alleged that former Louisiana Congressman Otto Passman dismissed her as his Deputy Administrative Assistant solely because she was a woman and he wanted a man in the position. Davis claimed Passman’s actions violated the equal protection component of the fifth amendment Due Process Clause. Invoking the court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Loe v. ArmisteadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  3. Rogin v. Bensalem TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Beller v. MiddendorfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API