Scherz v. South Carolina Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER. GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
MATZ, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
As Justice Jackson once good-naturedly confessed, “[pjrecedent, however, is not lacking for ways by which a judge may recede from a prior opinion that has proven untenable and perhaps misled others.... Baron Bromwell extricated himself from a somewhat similar embarrassment by saying, ‘The matter does not appear to me now as it appears to have appeared to me then.’ ” McGrath v. Kristensen, 340 U.S. 162, 177-78, 71 S.Ct. 224, 233, 95 L.Ed. 173 (1950) (Jackson, J., concurring).
A…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- C.E.R. 1988, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Bleecker v. Standard Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Neill v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Peal v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.