Graham v. Street
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDONOUGH, Justice.
In May of 1944, respondent and cross-appellant Graham commenced an action against the appellants herein, alleging that Graham and defendant Street had entered into a partnership for the purpose of purchasing and operating certain equipment; that the profits were to be equally divided; that defendants Street and Siegel conspired to exclude Graham from the partnership and defraud him of his interest; and praying that an accounting be had of the partnership dealings and transactions and for general relief. The lower court entered an interlocutory decree, finding the facts in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Falkenberg v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Gilham v. DevereauxMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Evans v. GaisfordUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Nuland v. PruynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Atha v. AthaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- Richardson v. Arizona Fuels Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. HatahleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Kraatz v. Heritage ImportsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Cooper v. FultonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.