Legal Opinion

McCready v. Fredericksen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1912No. 2357PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. C. Loofbowow, Judge. Action by John McCready against N. A. Fredericksen. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

FRICK, O. J.

On the 11th day of April, 1910, appellant commenced this action to quiet the title in himself to an undivided1 one-half interest in the real estate described in the findings. The respondent answered the complaint, and in his answer set up title in himself to the whole of the real estate in question, and prayed for a judgment or decree quieting the title thereto in himself. The appeal is upon the judgment roll without a bill of exceptions. The findings of fact made by the court, which in legal effect, for the purposes of this decision, may be treated as an agreed statement of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elder v. McClaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Winterburn v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Van Gunden v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1892
  4. Nelson v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. King v. CarmichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beckstrom v. BeckstromUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Olwell v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Walker v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Heiselt v. HeiseltUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Sperry v. TolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API