Legal Opinion
Ngom v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 2006No. 05-AA-888PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
The Compensation Review Board of the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) affirmed the Compensation Order of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the DOES Office of Hearings and Adjudication which held that petitioner, Ismalia Ngom, was not entitled to workers’ compensation because he left his employment “voluntarily.” Petitioner asks this court to review and reverse the decision rendered by DOES. After reviewing the decision of the ALJ, we cannot discern the basis for the ALJ’s finding that Mr. Ngom left his work voluntarily, and we remand for further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Valere Poulin v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Upchurch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Marriott International v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Georgetown University v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Borger Management, Inc. v. SindramDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golding-Alleyne v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hisler v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Andrews v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Andrews v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010