Miller v. Hanover Insurance

¶ 1. We review a decision of the court of appeals1 affirming the circuit court's order2 denying Zurich American Insurance Company's (Zurich) motion for relief from a de*645fault judgment and limiting Vearl Miller, Wanda Miller and Ross, Dayne and Wade Miller's (collectively, Miller) damages to $2 million. The following issues are presented for our review: (1) whether the circuit court properly entered a default judgment against Zurich for its failure to timely answer Miller's amended complaint; (2) whether the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying Zurich's motion for…