Legal Opinion
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 16, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
These cases, consolidated as one, are before us on a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not be allowed commanding the respondents to certify and send to this court the judgments and proceedings touching and concerning the valuations for the assessments of taxes for the year 1932, of certain properties of each petitioner located in the city of Jersey City.
Petitioners contend that they are entitled to a writ for the following reasons: (1) “Analysis of the testimony as to value reveals that the valuation as determined by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Equalization of TaxesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
- Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. State Board of TaxesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- City of Trenton v. John A. Roebling Sons Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Cromwell v. Hillsborough TP.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Hackensack Water Co. v. North Bergen TP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.