Legal Opinion
Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 11, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Katzektbach, J.
This case is before us on a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not be issued, directed to the state board of taxes and assessment, to certify and send to this court the judgment and proceedings touching and concerning the valuation for the assessment of taxes for the year 1926 of the property of the Hackensack Water Company, in the borough of Woodcliffe Lake, in the county of Bergen. It appears from the record that the prosecutor, the Hackensack Water Company, owns a tract -of two hundred and eighteen acres in the borough…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of TaxesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- City of Jersey v. BettcherNew Jersey Tax Court · 1943
- Central R. v. MartinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.