Legal Opinion
Hackensack Water Co. v. North Bergen TP.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 12, 1952No. Civ. No. 692-49PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
Defendants have moved for t'he^ entry of judgment on the pleadings in this suit upon the grounds principally that the court is without jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Some matters outside the pleadings have been presented to the court and will be considered since they are undisputed. The motion will Ibe treated as a motion for summary judgment, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 12(c), 28 U.S.C.A.,1 and for its purposes the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true.
The complaint in this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAX.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
- Delaware, Lackawanna and Western R. Co. v. KingsleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Cavanaugh v. PappasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Jones v. Township of North BergenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.