Legal Opinion

Beckwith v. American President Lines, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 18, 1946No. Nos. 26326-H, 26172-R, 26325-R, 26406-S, 26430-G, 26431-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The above-mentioned cases were regularly consolidated for the purpose of hearing the motions to remand made therein by plaintiffs. The complaints originally were instituted in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, seeking damages for the alleged negligent abandonment of plaintiffs by defer dant in Manila on December 10, 1941 and their subsequent capture and imprisonment by the Japanese, and for wages, bonus, maintenance and cure.

Thereafter, defendant, American President Lines, Ltd., filed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lykes Brothers-Ripley S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  2. Lindquist v. DilkesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Goetz v. Interlake S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. Ullrich v. New York, N. H. & H. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  5. Pabst v. Roxana Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moltke v. Intercontinental Shipping CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  2. Gutierrez v. Pacific Tankers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1948
  3. Kosek v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1950
  4. Wamsley v. Tonomo Marine, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API