Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2009No. 08-90113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

A misconduct complaint has been filed against a district judge. Complainant filed a pro se federal habeas petition, and the matter was assigned to the subject judge. The judge also presided over a state civil suit by complainant prior to joining the federal bench.

The bulk of complainant’s allegations involve the judge’s rulings as a state court judge in the earlier proceeding. Because the plain language of the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act limits its scope to conduct by federal judicial officers, 28 U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (d)(1), these allegations must be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  3. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API