Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 6, 2013No. 11-90099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Complainant, a pro se litigant who suffers from a communications disability, alleges that a district judge discriminated against him by refusing to allow complainant’s caretaker to act as his “authorized representative” and “address the court in his behalf.” In asking that his caretaker be allowed to represent him, rather than simply transmit his statements to the court, complainant sought more than a “reasonable accommodation” for his disability. He requested that the caretaker provide a service that may be performed only by a licensed attorney, which his caretaker…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Clyde Major Thompson, AKA Clyde JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Harris v. RamirezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Simmons v. KohDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API