Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2010No. 09-90124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Complainant argues that the subject judge, who was assigned to his criminal case, was biased against him because the judge had been the victim of a “crime ... nearly identical to those charged in [complainant’s] case.” Complainant filed a motion for recusal in his criminal case that was referred to another judge, who found no evidence of prejudice and denied the motion.

Complainant now files a misconduct complaint against the subject judge. Complainant alleges that the subject judge committed misconduct by failing to disqualify himself from complainant’s case because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re Complaint Against Circuit Judge Richard D. Cudahy. 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API