In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Complainant argues that the subject judge, who was assigned to his criminal case, was biased against him because the judge had been the victim of a “crime ... nearly identical to those charged in [complainant’s] case.” Complainant filed a motion for recusal in his criminal case that was referred to another judge, who found no evidence of prejudice and denied the motion.
Complainant now files a misconduct complaint against the subject judge. Complainant alleges that the subject judge committed misconduct by failing to disqualify himself from complainant’s case because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint Against Circuit Judge Richard D. Cudahy. 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011