Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 2, 1999No. A99A1274PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Anthony Cotton sued H & J Erectors, Inc. (the company which installed a printing press) and Reed Bowen (a co-employee) for injuries he sustained at work when his arm was crushed in the chiller rollers of the printing press. The trial court granted Bowen’s motion for summary judgment, and a jury found in favor of H & J Erectors in the subsequent trial. Cotton appeals both judgments. Because the Workers’ Compensation Act is the exclusive remedy for injuries sustained in the course of employment from a co-worker’s negligence, we affirm the grant of summary judgment to Bowen. And…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. PleasentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. David Allen Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  5. Warden v. Hoar Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Connell v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Cowart v. Crown American Properties, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. McTaggartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. J. M. S. Building Maintenance, Inc. v. AdcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API