Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rizzo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord Elliott, J.

¶ 1 This is an action for declaratory judgment brought by State Farm Ins. Co. (“State Farm”) and eventually presented to the court on joint stipulated facts. Instead of oral argument, both parties filed trial briefs. 1 On January 31, 2002, the trial court, the Honorable Flora Barth Wolf, entered an order essentially granting State Farm’s complaint for declaratory re lief. Sandra Rizzo (“daughter”) filed this timely appeal. 2 For the reasons that follow, we vacate the order entering judgment in favor of State Farm and enter judgment in favor of insureds. 3

¶ 2 The facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. CastegnaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Pressley v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Toner v. Travelers Home & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. CraleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Generette v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API