Smith v. Beasley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict because of an inadequate award of damages. Plaintiff contends that since defendant offered no evidence, her evidence was uncontradicted and should be treated as a stipulation. She argues that since the jury awarded less than that amount, it ignored plaintiffs evidence and the court’s instructions regarding pain and suffering.
In support of her position, plaintiff relies heavily upon the case of Robertson v. Stanley, 285 N.C. 561, 206 S.E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Inloes v. American Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Koury v. FolloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Blow v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Di Frega v. PuglieseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Blackmon v. BumgardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Thomas v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Smith v. N.C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.