Legal Opinion
Botschafter v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 28, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In Botschafter v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 33 Mass. App. Ct. 595 (1992), the Appeals Court affirmed a judgment in favor of all the defendants. The plaintiffs did not seek further appellate review. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has successfully obtained further appellate review (414 Mass. 1104 [1993]) of the Appeals Court’s determination that it had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the appeal of the judgment in favor of the FDIC, even though the FDIC had been appointed receiver while the appeal was pending. See Botschafter v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., supra at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Serge Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Eltrex International Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Michael M. Mills v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Nashua Trust Company, James P. Goodrich v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Dartmouth BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Charlotte Bueford v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for United Federal Savings Bank of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Robert Henderson v. Bank of New EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Bradford v. Baystate Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Botschafter v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simard v. Resolution Trust Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- SHAMROCK v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994