Legal Opinion

Adams v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 172, Calendar No. 35,276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Albert Adams, a bright young lad of the age of 12 years and 3 months at the time this cause of action arose, brought suit by next friend against defendant railroad companies. The names of the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company and that of the Canadian National Railway appear interchangeably as defendants in the pleadings. Defendants make no objection. The train and trades in question belonged to the Grand Trunk system. The crossing is now protected by a viaduct which was in process of construction at the time of the accident. A long string of freight cars was moved each day by the Grand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Lahnala v. Mineral Range Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Nagy v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Babcock v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API