Legal Opinion

Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 8, 2012No. 10-1821, 10-1866PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

These appeals arise out of a class action (technically a “collective action,” as it is brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), a part of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., rather than pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23) on behalf of 800 former and current hourly workers at U.S. Steel’s steel works in Gary, Indiana. The plaintiffs argue that U.S. Steel has violated the Act by failing to compensate them for the time they spend in putting on and taking off their work clothes in a locker room at the plant (“clothes-changing time”) and in walking from…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. Rochell Mitchell v. JCG IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Driver v. AppleIllinois, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  5. Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Allscripts Health Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API