Legal Opinion

P. J. Willis & Brother v. Munger Improved Cotton MacHine Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1896PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, Associate

Justice. — Appellants’ statement of the nature of the suit and the facts established upon the trial is substantially correct, and is here adopted: February 20, 1895, the Hunger Improved Cotton Hachine Hanufacturing Company, plaintiff and appellee, filed this suit in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against A. Hildebrandt and H. Bohne, defendants, on certain promissory notes, dated Harch 30, 1893, executed by them to plaintiff for the purchase money of certain machinery sold by plaintiff to said defendant, and foreclosure of mortgage lien of date Harch 30, 1893, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tifft v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Hutchins v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Eaves v. EstesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Harkey v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. San Antonio Brewing Ass'n v. Arctic Ice MacHine Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Panhandle Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Murray Co. v. SimmonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Weisenberger v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Southwestern Public Service Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Texas Power & Light Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API