Murray Co. v. Simmons
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Second Supreme Judicial District. Suit by the Jacksboro Oil and Milling Company against W. H.' and C. A. Simmons and the Murray Company. A judgment for plaintiff which gave it priority over the Murray Company was, on appeal of the Murray Company, affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (205 S. W. 517), and the Murray Company brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
This suit was brought by the Jacksboro Oil & Milling Company, hereinafter called the milling company, in the district court of Jack county on the 14th day of February, 1916, against W. H. and C. A, *462Simmons, hereinafter called. Simmons Bros., and the Mnrray Company. It was for recovery upon a note given by Simmons Bros, for $5,835.87, in renewal of two notes executed by them December 16, 1910, and for a foreclosure of a deed of trust given to secure this indebtedness. On December 16, 1910, Simmons Bros, owed a large debt to various creditors for gin machinery then in gins at Jean and Loving,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tifft v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hutchins v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Eaves v. EstesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Harkey v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ralway Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Citizens' National Bank of Abilene v. Elk Mfg. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Morris v. Biggs & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Weisenberger v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- David v. RoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.