Ewing v. Denney
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
David D. Ewing (“Ewing”) petitions for writ of habeas corpus. Ewing claims that he is being illegally restrained of his liberty by Larry Denney, Superintendent of the Crossroads Correctional Center (“Respondent”) because his trial counsel failed to perfect the filing of a timely notice of appeal and failed to inform Ewing that his appeal had been dismissed until it was too late to seek leave to file an appeal out of time. Ewing does not seek discharge from incarceration, but instead seeks to be re-sentenced so that a timely notice of appeal can be filed. Respondent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Simmons v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adam D. Bridgewater v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Linder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State of Missouri v. Lamar JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2021