Legal Opinion
Russell v. Harman International Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 12, 2014No. 13-7095PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves the conversion process set forth in Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. That rule provides:
If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under. Rule 56. All parties must be given a reasonable opportunity to present all the material that is pertinent to the motion.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(d). Patrick Russell, the appellant, complains that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- American Wildlands v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Jakimas v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Zevallos v. Obama Ex Rel. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Alvin Moore v. Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Stand Up for California! v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- In re LeopoldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.