Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifteenth District, City and County of San Francisco. There was judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appealed. The facts are stated m the opinion of the Court,

1Opinion of the CourtCrockett, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action against one O’Began, on a money demand, and took out an attachment, under which the defendant, a banking corporation, it is claimed, was summoned as a garnishee. Similar proceedings were had in behalf of F. T. and George Fisen, also creditors of O’Regan, who have assigned their demand to the plaintiffs. In each case judgment was duly rendered against O’Regan; but subsequently to the alleged service of the garnishment, the defendant paid to one Tucker the amount standing on its books to the credit of O’Regan, Tucker having produced to the officers of the bank…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Doe v. Springfield Boiler & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API