Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 10, 1897PublishedCited by 36 opinions

■ Indictment for'larceny. 'Before Judge Sweat. Ware superior court. November term, 1896.-' •

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

The defendant was convicted of thé offense of simple larceny, and submitted a motion for a new trial on several grounds. We have considered but two of these grounds, they being sufficient to remand the case for a new trial.

Speaking for myself, I find grave error in the charge of the judge in reference to the statement of the accused made at the trial, as set out in the seventh ground of the motion for new trial. I am disposed to regard the words of the statute as practically exhaustive of the law on the subject, when its positive provisions declare that the prisoner shall have the right to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Covington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  4. People v. VelardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Steadman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Pressley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Moyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Suddeth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API