Legal Opinion

Bainter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 2014No. 5D13-602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

David Bainter (defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence which were entered by the trial court after he pled nolo contendere to the charge of manufacturing cannabis. Determining that his motion to suppress should have been granted, we reverse.

The defendant was charged with committing the offense of manufacturing cannabis. He filed a pre-trial motion seeking to suppress cannabis seized from his home based on the claim that the seizure was the result of an illegal, warrantless search. After conducting a hearing, the trial court entered a written order denying the suppression motion. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Nieminski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Randall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Juan Guevara v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. State v. LohseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. SCOTT RUDOLPH v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API