Legal Opinion

Nieminski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 2011No. 2D10-1087PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Michael Nieminski appeals his judgment and sentence for trafficking in cannabis in excess of twenty-five pounds. He pleaded no contest to this charge and reserved the right to challenge the denial of the disposi-tive motion to suppress evidence obtained after law enforcement officers executed a search warrant on a marijuana grow house. The critical issue in this case is whether, without a warrant, deputies may enter a suburban or rural acreage completely surrounded by a six-foot chain-link fence in order to conduct a knock and talk at the front door of a residence. The only…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  4. J.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. State v. JacotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API