Nieminski v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Michael Nieminski appeals his judgment and sentence for trafficking in cannabis in excess of twenty-five pounds. He pleaded no contest to this charge and reserved the right to challenge the denial of the disposi-tive motion to suppress evidence obtained after law enforcement officers executed a search warrant on a marijuana grow house. The critical issue in this case is whether, without a warrant, deputies may enter a suburban or rural acreage completely surrounded by a six-foot chain-link fence in order to conduct a knock and talk at the front door of a residence. The only…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- J.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- State v. JacotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.