Legal Opinion

Ostrander v. Deerfield Lumber Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Raw. Action by George N. Ostrander against the Deerfield Dumber Company and Amos N. Blandin. On motion by defendants to ■set aside service of summons.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

The defendants, having appeared specially and moved this case from the Supreme Court of the state of New York to the District Court of the United States, now move to set aside the service of the summons made on the defendant Deerfield Dumber Company by serving same on Amos N. Blandin, its president, at Troy, N. Y., and on the said Amos N. Blandin individually, on the grounds: (1) That defendant Deerfield Dumber Company is a corporation of the state of Vermont, and not of the state of New York, and has no property, business, or place of business in the state of New York,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bull v. Chicago, M. & St. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  2. Knutson v. Campbell River Mills, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API