Legal Opinion
Parr v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1983No. Civ. 54197PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLMDAHL, J.
By petition for writ of mandate, Myron Parr (petitioner) asks us to command the respondent court to reverse its order compelling arbitration of his dispute with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (real party). The proceeding here arises from a superior court action for rescission and damages, filed by petitioner against real party.
This court originally denied petitioner’s request for an alternative writ, but upon his application to the Supreme Court hearing was granted and the case was returned to us “for reconsideration in light of Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Dryer v. Los Angeles RamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- William Bayma v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.