Legal Opinion

Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Schuenemann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1983No. 2551CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

This is an action instituted by appellees alleging violations by appellants of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann., § 17.41 et seq. (the “D.T. P.A.”), and Chapter 6 of the Consumer Credit Code, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. Art. 5069 (the “Credit Code”). The D.T.P.A. claim was settled. The trial court granted appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment on the Credit Code claim, and awarded them attorney’s fees. In two points of error, appellants challenge each of these actions by the lower court. We affirm.

The transaction made the basis of this suit…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Southland Life Insurance v. EganTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Anguiano v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Cochran v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. SchuenemannTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. TrotterTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Norman Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Texas Animal Health Commission v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1993
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. Eddie William Needham, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API