Legal Opinion

Texas Department of Transportation v. Eddie William Needham

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 29, 2001No. 03-00-00466-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABOUSSIE, Chief Justice.

Appellee Eddie Needham sued appellant Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”), alleging that TxDOT engaged in retaliatory discrimination against Need-ham in violation of the Texas Whistleblower Act. See Tex.Gov’t Code Ann §§ 554.001 .010 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). The trial court rendered judgment on a jury verdict, awarding Needham damages for back pay, employment benefits, medical expenses, compensatory damages, and attorney’s fees. TxDOT appeals, asserting that Needham adduced no evidence or insufficient evidence that TxDOT violated the Whistleblower Act. We will…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Mancorp, Inc. v. CULPEPPEERTexas Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Oak Mortgage Group, Inc. Michael H. Nasserfar Michael E. Task And Tycord R. Gosnay v. Ameripro Funding, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API