Jacobs v. Prichard
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. The facts, which involve the title to lands in the Puyallup Indian Reservation allotted under the treaty with the'Omaha Indians and the acts of March 3, 1893, and June 7, 1897, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Error to the Supreme Court of Washington to review a decree of that court which affirmed a decree’ of the Superior Court of the County of Pierce adjudging defendant.in error, who was plaintiff in the trial court, to be the owner of the east half and the ehst half of the east half of the west half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 35, township 21 N., R. 3 east of theWillamette. Meridian, Pierce County, Washington, formerly in King County,. Washington.;
The land lies in the Puyallup Indian Reservation and was allotted or patented by the United States on January 30,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Little Bill v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by21 opinions
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Blanset v. CardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Crosbie v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.