Legal Opinion

State, Department of Natural Resources ex rel. Herbst v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1973No. 43344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

The state, which was assessed for benefits in an order of the district court establishing Judicial Ditch No. 11 in Waseca and Blue Earth Counties, appeals from the order. The state claims that conditions attached to the permit required to be obtained from the commissioner of natural resources in order to construct the ditch precluded the assessment of benefits to the state resulting therefrom. We remand.

These proceedings were commenced in district court by petitioners under Minn. St. c. 106, the public drainage code, for the establishment of a drainage system. A portion of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. LennonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  2. Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Black v. Northwestern Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. In Re Lake Elysian High-Water LevelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Titrud v. AchterkirchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API