Carroll v. Ragsdale
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The controlling question presented by the main bill of exceptions will be answered by a proper construction of the 1925 amendment as amended by the 1927 act, the particular language requiring interpretation and construction being: “The compensation of court bailiffs as fixed by the grand jury shall be $200 per month, provided the commissioners of roads and revenues, or other authority having control of the county finances of such counties, shall first approve the payment of such salaries.” In construing a statute the obvious intention of the legislature will control and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Security & Trust Co. v. Commissioners of the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pickett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Singleton v. CloseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Pennington & Evans v. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Thompson v. Eastern Air Lines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Bibb County v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.