Judo, Inc. v. Delaney
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.
The court finds that although defendant knowingly entered into a contract with plaintiff for a course of instruction, and defaulted before taking any lessons, plaintiff failed to prove what damages were sustained as a result. This was not individual private instruction, and plaintiff’s place in a 10 to 15-man class could have been taken by another. Instruction was not on a semester basis, and pupils could start or stop at any time. The charge for the year was computed upon the basis of a fixed price per lesson. The contract was divisible. There was no provision for liquidated damages. Hence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spitz v. LesserNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Stashin v. RothmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- HBE Leasing Corp. v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. v. United Artists Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Abrams v. Temple of the Lost Sheep, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1990