Legal Opinion

Judo, Inc. v. Delaney

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 17, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.

The court finds that although defendant knowingly entered into a contract with plaintiff for a course of instruction, and defaulted before taking any lessons, plaintiff failed to prove what damages were sustained as a result. This was not individual private instruction, and plaintiff’s place in a 10 to 15-man class could have been taken by another. Instruction was not on a semester basis, and pupils could start or stop at any time. The charge for the year was computed upon the basis of a fixed price per lesson. The contract was divisible. There was no provision for liquidated damages. Hence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spitz v. LesserNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Stashin v. RothmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HBE Leasing Corp. v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. v. United Artists Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Abrams v. Temple of the Lost Sheep, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API