Legal Opinion

Spitz v. Lesser

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1951PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeoessel, J.

Plaintiff, inventor of a toy carrousel, entered into a contract with defendant on October 27,1948, whereby the latter, “Under an exclusive arrangement” with plaintiff, agreed to “ produce ” and make the toy “ for mass production *492sales to “ promote, market and ship same, under our own expense and by January 2, 1949, “ to have production samples * * * ready for market, complete with printed containers.” Defendant also agreed to pay plaintiff a royalty of 5% on the first $100,000 of net sales, 3% thereafter, and “ a Minimum for the first year —1949 — of. not less than ’ ’ $2,500; subject,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Steitz v. GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Harold S. Lee v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Ainger v. Michigan General Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. J. R. Loftus, Inc. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API