Legal Opinion

Stashin v. Rothman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 13, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiff is one of the institutions which contract to give lessons in English until a certain standard has been attained. The defendant refused to take or pay for the lessons contracted for.

The measure of damage in actions of this character is not of the kind discussed in Ware Bros. Co. v. Cortland Cart & Carriage Co., 210 N. Y. 122. In that case the contract price was held to be prima facie measure of the damage because the publishing of an advertisement involves no additional outlay of capital other than the inconsequential amount of paper and ink involved. In actions similar to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ware Bros. v. Cortland Cart & Carriage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Hillelson v. Old Reliable Motor Truck Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Judo, Inc. v. DelaneyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API