State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
The defendants argue that the trial court erred in several rulings related to in-court identification testimony of the defendants by State’s witnesses Marvin Massengill, Douglas Linkhous and Vernon Thurlby. Upon defendants’ motion to suppress the identifications, Judge Rousseau held voir dire hearings and determined that (1) some of the prior photographic line-ups shown to Massengill and Thurlby were unduly suggestive and should be suppressed; (2) the photographic line-up shown to Linkhous was not unduly suggestive; and (3) the in-court identifications of all three…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CaporassoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. DistanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. KaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.