Legal Opinion

Federal Paper Board Co. v. Hartsfield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1987No. 8713SC333PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendants’ single assignment of error is that the trial court erred by entering judgment disposing of this case without affording them a jury trial. By objecting to the order of reference at the time of its entry, filing timely exceptions to the referee’s findings of fact, formulating and tendering issues based upon those exceptions, and demanding a jury trial on the issues, defendants have satisfied procedural requirements necessary to preserve their right to a jury trial. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 53(b)(2). Even though procedurally preserved, however, defendants’ right to a jury trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Christenbury v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Memory v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marlowe v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. White v. FarabeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Rushing v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Parker v. DesherbininCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Hinman v. CornettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API