Potts v. Burkett

Statement.

PANNILL, C. J.

At a former day of this term the judgment in this case was reversed in part and affirmed in part. The affirmance resulted from our determination not to consider appellees’ cross-assignments of error. Upon a further consideration of that mat ter we bare concluded that we erred in refusing to consider such cross-assignments. The former opinion is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor:

Suit was brought below by appellants Burk-ett, Owens, and Wheeler against Johnson, Sonricker, Brazos Gasoline Company, a corporation, Potts, Wilson, Smith, and Jones. The suit…