Legal Opinion

Curry v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1928No. 386PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPannill, C. J.

The parties to this suit occupy in this court the same position as in the trial court, and will ¾⅜ designated in the same manner. The appellant Curry brought this suit against the Texas Company, Hanlon Gasolime Company, G. <⅜ Bateman, Mike Scott, and A. York; the purpose and object of the suit being to recover the royalties provided in the following contract between the plaintiff and the defendant the Texas Company :

“The Texas Company agrees with the roy. alty owner to keef> account of the casing-head gas as saved and utilized, or sold as aforesaid, rendering monthly statements if requested,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hager v. StakesTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Pierce Fordyce Oil Ass'n v. WoodrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Hardin v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Houston v. Howe & WiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Ellisor v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Ross v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. G & W MARINE, INC. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API