Legal Opinion

Screw & Bolt Division of Modulus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1974No. Appeal, No. 631 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Michael Hruneni (claimant) suffered an accident on September 15, 1969, while employed by the Screw & Bolt Division of Modulus (employer), and was unable to work from that day until November 10, 1969. The claimant was then able to return to work until March 2, 1970, when the disability recurred, and he has not since returned to work. During the periods when he *382was unable to work, tbe claimant received workmen’s compensation benefits at tbe rate of $60.00 per week as the result of an agreement with tbe employer. On September 11, 1970 tbe employer filed a termination…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Royal Pioneer Ind. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Harris v. No. 1 Contracting Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Shemanchick v. M. & S. Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. MacIupa v. UNION SWITCH & SIGNALCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. E-C Apparatus Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Gilroy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Norato v. Tasty Cake Baking Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API