Jordan v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Criminal law. Accessory. Indictment. Before Judge Tompkins. Spalding Superior Court. August Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Judge.
This ease was an indictment for being an accessory after the fact in receiving goods stolen from another. The indictment did not set out that John King had been convicted or charged with any offense at all, or tried for any offense. It simply alleged that the defendant received from John King a gold watch worth $100 00, the property of one J. N. Rosser, knowing that it had been stolen and taken and carried away from Rosser before that time. There is no allegation that in taking and carrying the gold watch away, that it had been taken from *93a house, so as to make defendant…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.