Pelham Manufacturing Company v. Ridlehuber
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
' WILSON, Justice.
Plaintiff recovered judgment of $2000 for personal injuries and $2000 for medical and hospital bills incurred, based on jury findings. Defendants’ “motion for judgment non obstante veredicto” (which was actually a motion to disregard the finding on “reasonable and necessary” medical and hospital expense on the ground no evidence of reasonableness was introduced) was overruled. Defendant, having filed no motion for new trial, appeals.
In the absence of motion for new trial, we are not authorized to consider defendants’ points that the evidence was insufficient to support the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Wagner v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Axtell Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Hines v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Courtesy Pontiac, Inc. v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Houston County v. Leo L. Landauer & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. PoormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. WasiakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- First American Life Insurance Co. v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.