Legal Opinion

Central National Bank v. Graham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Judgment creditor’s bill by the Central National Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, against James Graham. From an order denying an application to stay receivership proceedings, and adjudging defendant guilty of contempt in failing to respond to the summons of a circuit court commissioner, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The complainant on the 23d of March, 1898, recovered a judgment of $12,000 and upwards against the defendant in the Wayne circuit court. On the 12th of May following, a creditor’s bill in the usual form was filed, and, on the 19th of May following, Henry G. Nicol was appointed receiver of the property of the defendant, by an order which also required the defendant to appear before a circuit court commissioner for examination. On the 16th of June a circuit court commissioner’s summons was issued, requiring him to attend a hearing on the 23d of June of the matters in said case in *490reference…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turnbull v. Prentiss Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Williams v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Dutton v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Kaye-KibbeyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Security Mut. Life Ins. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. McBride v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API