People v. Perea
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIL, J., pro tem.
The contention of appellant is that he was not accorded a speedy trial to which he was entitled under article I, section 13, of the constitution, nor a trial within the time provided in sections 681a, 1050, and 1382 of the Penal Code.
Section 681a is general in its terms and directory merely. It requires that all proceedings in criminal eases shall be had and determined at the earliest possible time.
Section 1050 reads as follows: “The court shall set all criminal cases for trial for a date not later than thirty days after the date of entry of the plea of the defendant. No…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Isaac & Rebecca Thomas v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Gillis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Ray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. EcholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Zamloch v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF CITY AND COUNTY OF SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.