Estate of William Hayden Schuck v. County of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTATE OF WILLIAM HAYDEN Case No.: 3:23-cv-00785-DMS-AHG SCHUCK, et al., 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, 13 DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 14 CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 TO ASCERTAIN DOE DEFENDANTS Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 10] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited 25 Discovery to Ascertain “Doe” Defendants’ Identities. ECF No. 10. Plaintiffs ask the Court 26 to permit them to propound…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Wakefield v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Columbia Insurance v. Seescandy.ComDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.