Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Johnson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of-Mercer county; the Hon. Frank D. Ramsay, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The track of the railroad of the appellant company crosses from north to south a tract of land belonging to appellee, in Mercer county. A prior owner of the land conveyed a strip one hundred feet wide to the company in 1879, upon which the track was laid. The track of the company was carried over a depression or ravipe by a bridge, of the length of about sixty-four feet when the road was first constructed, but subsequently the length of the bridge was reduced to forty-eight feet. In August, 1902, the company began the work of filling this depression under the bridge on its right of way with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. IvesIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Menter v. First Baptist ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Healy v. RobertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Davis v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API