Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Ives

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. Prank D. Ramsay, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hand

This was a bill filed by the appellees in the circuit court of Mercer county to enjoin appellant from closing the openings under two bridges, known as 450 and 45D, on the Keithsburg branch of its railroad, and for a decree establishing in the appellees a perpetual'easement for the passage of their live stock across the right of way of the appellant beneath said bridges. The issues having been made up, the case was referred to the master to take proofs and report his conclusions. A report was filed by him recommending that a decree be entered in accordance with the prayer of the bill, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of SedaliaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HoagIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Dexter v. TreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Rose v. City of FarmingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. MunsellIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Waller v. HildebrechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. DonovanOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bontz v. StearIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Omodt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Sparling v. Fon Du Lac TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API