Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Redd

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 14, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChichester, J.

This is an action by notice of motion for judgment, by H. Carter Redd and J. H. Rives, Jr., receivers, *336against Frank J. Schmitt and Myrtle E. Schmitt, upon a negotiable note for $2,000.00 made by Frank J. and Myrtle E. Schmitt, and payable to one Robert H. Purvis.

The receivers recovered a judgment for $2,000.00 with interest and costs against the Schmitts in the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond where the cause was heard without the intervention of a jury, and a writ of error was duly allowed from this judgment.

So far as this controversy is concerned the essential facts out of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hall Building Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Mansfield v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Clendenning's Adm'r v. Thompson's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kavanaugh v. WheelingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Rives v. GoochSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  3. Ragland v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Wool v. Nationsbank of Virginia, NASupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Johnson v. ShafferWarren County Circuit Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API